Bobbi 的个人资料Empty Space照片日志列表更多 工具 帮助
    6月3日

    Supreme Court Nominee, Sonia Sotomayor

    I wasn't going to get into the discussion about Supreme Court nominee, Sonia Sotomayor; but, I'm getting tired of hearing what a racist the woman is. Because she once said that she felt that as a Latino woman she could make a better decision than a white man on some case she was reviewing, she shouldn't set on the Supreme Court. Well, then our founding fathers weren't fit to hold their offices or for that matter, found this great nation. Yes, our founding fathers were RACIST, SEXIST, and IN FAVOR OF THE WEALTHY CLASS TO RULE. My God, wash my mouth out with soap. How can I speak ill of the men that found this nation and gave us the freedoms that we have today. THEY DIDN'T! The founding fathers (notice no founding mothers) wanted this nation to be governed by white, wealthy, men. They didn't give females the right to vote, nor people of color. They didn't think the poor knew enough to hold office nor govern our country. They wanted only white, wealthy, men to take this country on its voyage into the future. They wanted to make George Washington king not president. So, get off your Washington high-horse and quit getting on news programs and stating that Sonia Sotomayor is too racist to set on the Supreme Court. Judge the woman on her merits, not on remarks she made concerning her nationality versus some wealthy, white, male. Quit with the remarks about this nation was founded on freedom for everyone, because it wasn't and probably will never be free from race, gender, or amount of money in your pocket.

    评论 (5)

    请稍候...
    很抱歉,您输入的评论太长。请缩短您的评论。
    您没有输入任何内容,请重试。
    很抱歉,我们当前无法添加您的评论。请稍后重试。
    若要添加评论,需要您的家长授予您相应权限。请求权限
    您的家长禁用了评论功能。
    很抱歉,我们当前无法删除您的评论。请稍后重试。
    您已超过了一天之内允许提供的评论数上限。请在 24 小时后重试。
    因为我们的系统表明您可能在向其他用户提供垃圾评论,您的帐户已禁用了评论功能。如果您认为我们错误地禁用了您的帐户,请联系 Windows Live 支持部门
    完成下面的安全检查,您提供评论的过程才能完成。
    您在安全检查中键入的字符必须与图片或音频中的字符一致。

    若要添加评论,请使用您的 Windows Live ID 登录(如果您使用过 Hotmail、Messenger 或 Xbox LIVE,您就拥有 Windows Live ID)。登录


    还没有 Windows Live ID 吗?请注册

    没有名字发表:
    好站推薦~
    http://longsong.com.tw , http://fzlog.com , http://27867446.com.tw , http://lgid.com.tw , http://gnlog.com , http://meimei888.com , http://jylog.com , http://goldenwish.com.tw , http://kmtai53.com.tw , http://ywlog.com , http://ufc.com.tw , http://fqlog.com , http://borg-build.com.tw , http://hukang.com.tw , http://harplo.com.tw , http://ericart.com.tw , http://mms4u.com.tw , http://kjm.com.tw , http://kllog.com , http://e-new.com.tw , http://fplog.com , http://yehching.com.tw , http://46-1k.com.tw , http://hummer.idv.tw , http://cygift.com.tw , http://xweb.com.tw , http://hllog.com , http://friendstalk.com.tw , http://lhlog.com , http://znet.com.tw , http://richforever.com.tw , http://revive.com.tw , http://fashion-tokyo.idv.tw , http://88u.com.tw , http://cw123.com.tw , http://hitrontech.com.tw , http://ttj.com.tw , http://cpbio.com.tw , http://yhlog.com , http://101clinic.com.tw , http://calf.com.tw , http://artofliving.com.tw , http://huban.com.tw , http://dfarm.idv.tw , http://cmr.com.tw , http://lovecookie.com.tw , http://overurl.com , http://shome.idv.tw , http://eleer.com.tw , http://wiwe.com.tw , http://98guide.com.tw , http://elpaso.com.tw , http://xhlog.com , http://siraya.idv.tw , http://renata.idv.tw , http://tzlog.com , http://tplog.com , http://wfg.com.tw , http://jllog.com , http://mobitek.com.tw , http://kt-sl.com.tw , http://rjlog.com , http://pastaonion.com.tw , http://gmwear.com.tw , http://phtourass.com.tw , http://photoshock.com.tw , http://yes-queen.com , http://0492801699.com.tw , http://xqlog.com , http://top-prize.com , http://pspd.com.tw , http://guppy.idv.tw , http://goodgame.com.tw , http://mysun.com.tw , http://wang-shian.com.tw , http://hjlog.com , http://welljob.com.tw , http://vdlog.com , http://hongching.com.tw , http://czlog.com , http://maltose.com.tw , http://lerouge.com.tw , http://jdbook.com.tw , http://balsamico.com.tw , http://qxlog.com , http://clnwoman.com.tw , http://bhfow.com , http://penny.com.tw , http://eatviva.com.tw , http://qglog.com , http://chyhua.com.tw , http://findtea.com.tw , http://happydv.com.tw , http://uqlog.com , http://foldcat.com.tw , http://club165.net , http://mhms.com.tw , http://ijlog.com , http://aylog.com , http://hideyoshi.com.tw ,
    9 小时以前
    Omg - congratulations for saying how it really is - pity your fellow americans cannot see the wood for the trees. They appear not to realise that the constitution [ which, from memory begins WE the people NOT you the people], was a copy of the Magna Carta with 18th century English and French philisophies added. Liberty, equality and fraternity. . . the most Socialist of ideals in 2 constitutions before Marx was even born !! If america is not the most racist nation on the planet - then the pope is not catholic. The fact you have to be a multi millionaire to even canvas for the presidency is maintaining the class system in the USA. Keep telling us how it is, I for one appreciate your comments.
    8 月 20 日
    sherri发表:
    We are not free, and never have been, never will be, man will destroy his own self. because of Greed; Just my opinion; Hope I Did not offend you in anyway; nice to meet you.
    7 月 18 日
    I agree with everything John stated, except for the fact that I believe character is indeed an issue to focus on when discussing the appointment of a judge who intends to preside over any court. Whilst factoring an individual's character when nominating them to a bench position should be of a major consideration, it should not be an only consideration. Ms. Sotomayor has a long list of questionable issues that should be cause for alarm to those who support and defend the language of the U.S. Constitution, without ever having to address her numerous character flaws.

    As for accusing the Founding Fathers of being 'RACIST, SEXIST, and IN FAVOR OF THE WEALTHY CLASS TO RULE'; that argument can be likened to any other argument using the opening statement, "YOU people, ..." The fact remains, it happened to be those Founding Fathers who fought against the "favour of the wealthy class to rule", ensuring you not only have the freedom to make such a baseless accusation against them but also guaranteed you have the Constitutional 1st Amendment Right to publicly express such a baseless accusation. Otherwise, you would certainly be a subject to a "wealthy class monarch".

    As for the United States not being "fair", in your perceived opinion, regarding "race, gender, or status", there are many nations around the globe from which to chose residency. Having lived in a few of the "wealthier, more democratic" ones, I assure you, none have been given the freedoms and protections you obviously take for granted, which are guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and its Bill of Rights. If a "greater; more just" nation did exist, I am sure you would have already expatriated to that location, instead of residing in the United States and complaining about its potential discrepancies which have yet to apply to you. Correct?
    6 月 10 日
    John发表:
    The media is not focusing on Sotomayor's associations. She is all over the map on her decissions, some mundane, some controversal, so her record is sketchy. I agree that focusing on character for a judge is not the right approach. I do not agree with the whole minority empathy argument being proped up by the Obama administration. The minority organization she has supported and spoken for has some elements that are anti-American, seperatist, racist, and confrontational, it is this that worries me about her, her complicit silent approval of their actions because they share a harritage. Would this be any different then Clarence Thomas quietly supporting the Black Panthers or the Nation of Islam, which he did not do, or any different then a white man working on the fringe of a white supremacy group? She is not the smartest, most qualified, or most political of candidates, her nomination is strictly political and she is replacing a liberal justice so the leaning of the court will not change that much.

    As long as she can apply rational interpretations of the Constitution against laws and make rulings based on the facts and evidance presented to her then I have no problem. If she is to push an agenda, legislate from the bench, or show favortism to cases she has empathy toward then this will not work out for justice or America's best interest.
    6 月 8 日

    引用通告

    引用此项的网络日志